The aim of this systematic review was to compare the accuracy of implant impression techniques between conventional technique and intraoral scanner in partial edentulism. Systematic search was conducted in PubMed,
Scopus, and Cochrane, from January 2000 to January 2024. Among the total of 4,544 publications, 14 were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sub-grouped meta-analysis was conducted following the accuracy parameters; inter-implant distance deviation favoring conventional techniques (p = 0.05), three-dimensional deviation (trueness and precision) favoring digital techniques (p = 0.007). The results found that the numbers of studies were comparable between the studies favoring conventional techniques and the studies favoring digital techniques. However, technologies of intraoral scanner have been developed, resulting in improved accuracy of digital technique. Implant impression with digital techniques tend to performed better accuracy compared to conventional techniques in recent studies of partial edentulism. In case of two to three implants and inter-implant angulation under 20 degrees, both conventional and digital implant impression could be performed. Further studies that perform standardized methodologies both in laboratory and clinical condition are required to conduct meta-analysis.